Skeptics Put Forth $1 Million Psychic Challenge

I love stories like this. Psychics are, for the most part, a very defensive group. They proclaim to have amazing powers, and anyone who doesn’t believe them is just not “open-minded” or whatever. When asked to prove their abilities, there’s always the convenient excuse of “I can’t control the visions!” Well, they seem pretty “in control” of their ability during the tapings of their TV shows, or as soon as you hand over your $20. My motto has always been: put your money where your mouth is. I believe in psychic abilities. I honestly believe our brains can be sensitive to things that aren’t immediately apparent to our 5 known senses. But so-called psychics such as James Van Praagh, Sylvia Browne, John Edward and others are really just snake oil salesmen (and saleswomen). Take people’s money, use some old parlor trick that I myself learned how to do from my college textbook, and boom, it’s as easy as that. You have cold hard cash, your customer has some vague information, like “something” will happen in September. At some point. In some year. But now someone is offering them money to prove their abilities.

"Here he is, the biggest douche in the universe..."

A non-profit organization called The James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) has announced that it is publicly offering $1 million to celebrity “psychic mediums” including James Van Praagh, Allison DuBois, Sylvia Browne, Carla Baron, John Edward, and others if they can prove their abilities in controlled experiments.

“James Van Praagh and Allison DuBois have turned the huckster art of ‘cold reading’ into a multi-million-dollar industry, preying on families’ deepest fears and regrets,” said James Randi, founder of the JREF and a renowned magician and skeptic.

The JREF’s Million Dollar Challenge Director, a mentalist performer named Banachek, said, “We’re issuing a challenge: If one of you can demonstrate your ‘psychic’ abilities on randomly chosen strangers — not celebrities — under mutually-agreed conditions, without relying on known cold-reading techniques such as fishing around with vague questions, and without just using Google — we will donate our million dollars to you or to the charity of your choice.”

The skeptics explained how psychics can give the appearance of getting accurate information about a person they’ve never met.

“Cold reading” is a set of techniques in which personal information is elicited from a person, often through vague or leading questions, and then repeated back to the person in order to persuade them that the performer has supernatural access to that information.

Another mentalism technique, called “hot reading,” involves obtaining information on a person in advance, for example by researching the Internet (or, in some cases, even hiring an investigator).

James Randi has exposed such “psychic” techniques for years, including his 1986 investigation into TV faith healer Peter Popoff, who knew details of his audience members’ lives, including their illnesses and home addresses.

Randi showed that Popoff was actually getting his apparently psychic (or God-given) information from his wife (who had researched certain people in the audience) via a short-wave radio and hidden earpiece.

Psychics have reason to be cautious about putting their abilities to the test. The track record of psychics is abysmal, for example when it comes to helping police find missing persons. Despite claims to the contrary, there is not a single documented case of a missing person being found or recovered due to psychic information.

The fact that psychics have failed to find high-profile missing persons cannot be denied, and is there for all to see: Countless missing people, including Natalee Holloway, Laci Peterson, Madeleine McCann, Chandra Levy, Sandra Cantu, Caylee Anthony, Elizabeth Smart, Jaycee Dugard, and so on, either remain missing to this day or were found accidentally by strangers or in the course of normal police searches.

In each case hundreds of psychics gave information about the person’s location while they were missing — and every single psychic turned out to be wrong.

Tennessee nursing student Holly Bobo, for example, has been missing for over four months despite information from hundreds of psychics across the country; one of them even predicted that she would be found alive within a few days of her disappearance. Sadly, the psychics were wrong again.

Earlier this year a psychic told Texas police that several children had been killed at a rural farmhouse, sending dozens of police to the scene; she, too, was wrong.

Of course, just because psychics have not been able to find missing persons doesn’t mean that they might not have other psychic abilities. It’s important to keep an open mind, and try to demonstrate psychic powers in an objective, scientific manner, under conditions that rule out deception.

The Million Dollar Challenge has been around for many years. Some psychics have claimed that the money does not really exist (as part of a Nightline primetime special that aired Friday, ABC News verified that the money is real and available, held in trust by a third party).

Others have suggested that psychics would not use their powers for personal gain (they should check out the ticket prices for appearances and workshops by some of these celebrity psychics), though of course the winning psychic could donate the $1 million to charity.

Will these celebrity psychics take Randi’s challenge? If they have the powers they claim, and can demonstrate them under scientific conditions, they have nothing to lose.

In fact, the publicity of having their abilities validated would likely raise their profiles even higher (to say nothing of the satisfaction they would get from publicly proving the skeptics wrong).

Either the psychic information they give is accurate, or it isn’’t; there’s no real way that skeptics could disprove genuine psychic powers. If the psychics have the powers they claim, they have nothing to lose and $1 million to gain.

I know, my opinions here (as well as this story) will piss a lot of people off, both the psychics and the numbskulls who pay $20 a pop to have someone read their palms. Boo-freakin’-hoo. If you can’t guarantee your services or info, don’t take people’s money for it. Paranormal investigators don’t charge their clients, because there is too much we don’t know. We don’t know if we’ll catch evidence. If we do, we don’t know how it will or can be interpreted. If you can’t guarantee the service, you shouldn’t charge money for it. I’m gonna say none of these shmucks actually step forward to try to claim the million dollars. Maybe I’m psychic.

2 comments on “Skeptics Put Forth $1 Million Psychic Challenge

  1. LMAO! Jason, sometimes you are just too funny. I have met my share of psychics who seem nice enough, but are desperate to have anyone believe in them. (As in their powers, but also I think in them just in general too. Some are clearly playing make believe.)

    I do believe some people see things. I have had countless visions of things happening…but I never can pinpoint anything so fat lot of good it does anybody. For instance, I dreamt of 2 planes flying into 2 twin bldgs in 1997. It was where I worked, which was not the Twin Towers, but Phx’s version of them. (Mini-scale of course.) I told a few people about the weird dream I had, but that was it. It was just a weird dream. (That immediately came back to me the day the Towers got hit.)

    But all my life this has happened. I dream of things sometimes as they’re happening, or just immediately before. Others times I dream of it years and years before it happens. But I’ve always wondered…am I psychic or having dreams that I can mold later to fit whatever happened?

    Although…I have dreamt of places I’ve never seen and then later seen them. But, again, perhaps my subconscious made it so I went to these places to make my dreams come true?

    It’s really tricky and so innacurrate and open to interpretation that I can’t claim being psychic. And wouldn’t even if I could.

    I think for entertainment value, there are some good showmen and women out there. If it was passed off as that, I’d be more okay with it. (And a few actually do that.) Some also just have a very calm, nuturing vibe and there are a lot of people out there who don’t get that in their everyday lives. It’s a way for them to be around a non-toxic person. I don’t know that those kind of “psychics” should call themselves psychics. They’re more energy people.

    Sorry…I’m leaving you a rambling comment. All I know is I think we all have some measure of intution. I don’t really know if people can talk to the dead or whatever. There was a show once that tested psychics. It was pretty neat. A few of them were pretty good, but for the most part it was a fail. (Wish I could remember the name.)

    I’m interested in seeing who steps up to the plate for this challenge. Did you see the Beyond Belief where they covered psychics? I LOVED when they showed Ms. Confident Sylvia Browne being WRONG as wrong could be about a dead boy. (Who was alive, but she told the parents to their faces he was dead.) Why anyone buys that woman’s BS has always been beyond me.

    VERY awesome post. Again…sorry for the lengthy reply. It’s what you do to me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.