I know Jack the Ripper has nothing to do with the paranormal, but the most famous serial killer in history has always been one of those great unsolved mysteries to me, and I’ve pretty much read just about every book about him that I could get my hands on. So I’m sort of an armchair expert in Ripperology (if you will). And as someone who has studied Saucy Jack for years now, I’ve grown accustomed to the “news” every few years that some researcher (who inevitably has some book or other moneymaking project to promote) claims to have “finally” solved the crime. I came upon this story today, wherein a detective makes a bunch of bold claims – most of which have already been known for years. And he makes his own proclamation regarding who the Ripper actually was. Oh, and he’s also in the middle of promoting his one=man show about Jack the Ripper. My thoughts follow the article, but suffice it to say, here is just another blowhard “solution” in a long line of them…
THE Jack the Ripper mystery that has kept the world enthralled since the killer first struck on the streets of Victorian London has been blown apart on the 125th anniversary of the grisly crimes by a former murder squad detective.
And the bad news for the countless millions of amateur sleuths who have spent years trying to identify the nation’s most notorious serial killer is that he never existed.
He was just dreamed up by a drunken journalist called Thomas Bulling who wrote a forged letter to Scotland Yard in 1888 pretending to be “Jack” so he could obtain a scoop.
More than 300 books and dozens of films and TV programmes have named in excess of 100 different men, often on the flimsiest of evidence, as the serial murderer who slashed the throats of five women who he then disembowelled, bringing terror to the gas lit streets of Whitechapel.
The suspects have included everyone from Queen Victoria’s grandson the Duke of Clarence to Alice in Wonderland author Lewis Carroll.
Some even said a Sioux Indian warrior called Black Elk, who toured Britain with Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show in the 1880s, was the guilty man. Others believed child charity campaigner Dr Barnardo was “Jack”.
But Trevor Marriott, a former murder squad detective with Bedfordshire police, has spent 11 years carrying out a detailed cold-case review of the killings, he has trawled Scotland Yard’s files and used modern-day police techniques backed up with state of the art forensic analysis.
“The facts of this case have been totally distorted over the years,” said Mr Marriott.
“The general public have been completely misled by any number of authors and publishers.
“Jack is supposed to be responsible for five victims, but there were other similar murders before and after the ones attributed to him, both in this country and abroad in America and Germany.”
In total Mr Marriott has discovered 17 unsolved Ripper-like murders committed between 1863 and 1894. He believes a German merchant seaman called Carl Feigenbaum was responsible for some, but not all of those killings.
Feigenbaum was a crew member on ships that regularly docked near Whitechapel. He was executed in New York in 1896 after being caught by US police fleeing the scene of a Ripper-style murder there.
“The reality is there was just a series of unsolved murders and they would have sunk into oblivion many years ago, but for a reporter called Thomas Bulling,” said Mr Marriott.
Bulling was a drunken journalist with many police contacts at Scotland Yard, who in 1888 was working for the London-based Central News Agency. He was paid to supply crime stories for newspapers.
“Police got a letter that Bulling had written about the murders which he signed ‘Jack the Ripper’,” said Mr Marriott.
“It was the most ingenious piece of journalism that has kept this mystery alive for 125 years. Even now any modern-day serial killer is called a ‘Ripper’.
“You have to ask yourself if ‘Jack’ is an urban myth. Around 80 per cent of the books about him have a picture of a chap on the front stalking the streets of London in a long black cape and a top hat.
“They were the clothes of an upper class, wealthy man. But back in 1888 if someone dressed like that had actually walked around Whitechapel in the dead of night they wouldn’t have lasted five minutes.
“It wasn’t just one of the most crime-riddled areas of London, it was one of the worst areas in the country. It’s a false image that has been created by the likes of Hollywood film makers.
“New facts have come to light, we’ve now disproved the claim that the killer removed organs from the victims at the scenes of the murders, the organs were removed later once they were in a mortuary.
“There just isn’t a Jack The Ripper as such.”
But the interest in the Ripper murders is still so strong that just this month the East London Advertiser, the newspaper that covers the Whitechapel area published a 12-page souvenir pull out to mark the 125th anniversary of the crimes.
Meanwhile Trevor Marriott is mid-way through a 36-date theatre tour of the UK with his one man show called “Jack The Ripper A 21st Century Investigation” in which he reveals the research he has done and the forensic evidence that he says finally reveals the real story about the killings.
Ok, so first of all, the letter by Bulling. Anyone who has even casually read about Jack the Ripper probably knows that this “Jack the Ripper” letter was a fabrication by a journalist. So that’s not really news, and it doesn’t take away from the fact that women were being murdered. Secondly, how he looked. Again, most people with a passing interest in Jack the Ripper realize he was not the cape and top hat- wearing aristocrat of Victorian London. That was a romanticized image from books and movies. Sort of how Dracula was made into a dapper aristocrat in the movies, nothing like Bram Stoker’s undead villain. Lastly, the suspect and number of killing. As with any serial killer, it’s hard to really tell which murders were done by a certain killer. Sure, you can group together the ones that look similar, but killers evolve, they change their styles here and there, they move to different locations. Plus you can have copycats. The Green River Killer is a great example of a case where the murders were all lumped in together by the media, but expert profilers knew there was more than just one murderer. As for Carl Feigenbaum being the Ripper? He’s just as likely as any of the other suspects. The truth is, we will probably never solve this mystery.